[3525 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL If id TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAp^ i 6^ A ■O AND THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO" WRIT PETITION NO: 8553 OF 2Q2fi Between: Guntur Jani Basha, S/o Alla Bhaskhu Aged about 42 years, Occ; Painadu District. Agriculturalist R/o Pinneli, MachavaramMandalam Presently Residing at Mailareddy Gudem State of Telangana. ...PETITIONER/S AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, 2. The Director General Vaddeswaram, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopet, Painadu 4. The Station House Officer, Dachepalli Police Station, I 5. The Sub Inspector of Police, Dachepalli Police Station Home Department, Secretariat, rep by its Principal Secretary. of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh District. Painadu District. Painadu District. ...RESPONDENT/S Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ, order or direction directing the respondents to produce petitioner nephew Chintapalli Bakshu before this Hon'ble Court. ^ Alla Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY sanepalli Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: i 1 i- I I 1 \ ! ? D I 'w % APHC010166492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] TUESDAY .THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8553/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Guntur Jani Basha AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAMAL7\KSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI I CounseJ for the Respondent(S): 1 .THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Remand Report and the order of remand have been placed before this Court by the learned Government Pleader. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that various submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the detenues before 2. the learned Magistrate were not considered by the learned Magistrate, and as such, this Court would have to intervene in the matter. 3. As the remand order does not mention any of the said submissions it would be difficult for this Court to proceed on that basis. 4. In the circumstances, this Writ Petition is Closed leaving it open to the petitioner or the detenues to set out their case in writing before the learned Magistrate and seek an order on that basis. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SECt\ON //TRUE COPY// off\cer To, 1. One CC to SRI. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CC's to THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Advocate, High Court of A.P: [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED;29/04/2025 ORDER ^25 SEP 2025 )sj '^iNCiLrrwtStcliijilX^y 55 WP.No.8553 of 2025 THE WRIT PETITION IS CLOSED WITHOUT COSTS