Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44378 (RAJ)

UMESH S/O MURARI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14043/2025 · 2025-12-06

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49657] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14043/2025 Umesh S/o Murari Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gudla Chandan, Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chand Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Ummed Singh, Dy. SP PHQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 06/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 315/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 112(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, 2008 and Section 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is young person, aged about 23 years. It is further submitted that the applicant is in custody since 14.10.2025 and that the FIR in the instant matter has been lodged by the police authorities. Moreover, it is submitted that the matter at hand [2025:RJ-JP:49657] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14043/2025] pertains to doubling of money and amount to the tune of Rs.83,000/- is involved in the matter. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, considering the overall facts and taking note of the fact that the applicant is young person, aged about 23 years; that the applicant is in custody since 14.10.2025 and upon perusal of the material available at record but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Umesh S/o Murari Lal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/31