[2025:RJ-JP:48594] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18632/2025 1. Prabhunarayan S/o, Late Shri Chotu Ram, aged about 65 Years, R/o Village Chirota, Post Ajayrajpura, Tehsil- Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Lala Ram S/o Late Shri Chotu Ram, aged about 56 Years, R/o Village Chirota, Post Ajayrajpura, Tehsil-Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Hanuman Sahay S/o, Late Shri Chotu Ram, aged about 50 Years, R/o Village Chirota, Post Ajayrajpura, Tehsil- Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Gopal S/o, Late Shri Rugha, aged about 57 Years, R/o Village Chirota, Post Ajayrajpura, Tehsil-Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Ramdayal S/o, Late Shri Bodu Ram, aged about 33 Years, R/o Village Chirota, Post Ajayrajpura, Tehsil-Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Kamlesh S/o, Late Shri Bodu Ram, aged about 30 Years, R/o Village Chirota, Post Ajayrajpura, Tehsil-Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) 7. Rajkumar S/o, Late Shri Sitaram, aged about 32 Years, R/o Village Chirota, Post Ajayrajpura, Tehsil-Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, through The Secretary, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 01/12/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, Appellate Tribunal, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) whereby the stay application filed by the petitioners in Reference Petition No.531/2025 has been rejected. [2025:RJ-JP:48594] (2 of 2) [CW-18632/2025] 2. Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal, learned counsel appears on behalf of the sole respondent i.e. JDA. 3. This Court observes that the learned Tribunal did not find any prime facie case in favour of the petitioner and consequently dismissed the stay application. 4. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusal the relevant material on record, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order dated 06.10.2025 passed by the learned Tribunal. 5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that appropriate directions may be issued to the learned Tribunal to dispose of the reference petition in a time bound manner. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the said prayer. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case as also in the interest of justice, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the learned Tribunal to decide the said reference petition as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, without being influenced by this order. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition is disposed of. 9. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /4