IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRILf-^l#^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o V -r PRESENT ^ t THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No: 10479 OF 2025 Between: B.Venkata Ramudu @ Venkatrami Reddy, S/o. Late Lingareddy, Aged about 83 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. D.No. 4-61, Thalagachipalli, Garladinne, Ananthapuramu District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Ananthapuramu District at Ananthapuramu. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District. 4. The Tahsildar, Garladinne Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his land Ac. 1.70 cents in Survey No. 280/1A situated at Garladinne Village & Mandal, Anantapur District without any notice or without following due process of law illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 19 (1)(g), 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents ; not to interfere with the petitioners subject land Ac. 1.70 cents in Survey No. 2^0/lA situated at Garladinne Village & Mandal, Anantapur District. lANo: i OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interference with the Petitioner subject land Ac.1.70 cents in Survey No. 280/1A situated at Garladinne Village & Mandal, Anantapur District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BAND! SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: ASST.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER .r APHC010210872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10479/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER B Venkata Ramudu @ Venkatrami Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BANDI SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: . 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10479/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs;- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his land Ac.1.70 cents in Survey No.280/1A situated at Garladinne Village and Mandal, Anantapur District without any notice or without following due process of law as Illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 19 (1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s subject land Ac.1.70 cents In Survey No.280/1A situated at Garladinne Village and Mandal, Anantapur District and pass such other order. ” 2. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the case, requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property without following due process of law. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property. the respondents would follow due process of law. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government 3 Pleader for the respondents, it is observed that when the petitioner is settled possession and enjoyment of the subject property, he cannot be dispossessed, without following due process of law in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in "Rame Gowda (dead) by L.Rs. V. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs.^’’. Therefore, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property, except by following due process of law. in 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ^2004(1) see 769 Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE eOPY// N OFFICER S To 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Ananthapuramu District at Ananthapuramu. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District. 4. The Tahsildar, Garladinne Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. 5. One CC to Sri Bandi Srihari, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies. gi HIGH COURT DATED:23/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10479 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS