[2025:RJ-JP:49188] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6410/2025 1. Rahul S/o Rohitas, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Vpo, Paniyala, Distt. Kotputli- Behror (Raj). 2. Ajay S/o Ram Saran, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Vpo, Paniyala, Distt. Kotputli- Behror (Raj). 3. Abishak S/o Subhas, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Vpo, Paniyala, Distt. Kotputli- Behror (Raj). 4. Sachin Payla S/o Jairam, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Vpo, Paniyala, Distt. Kotputli- Behror (Raj). 5. Mohan Lal S/o Rohitas, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Holawas,teh. Bansur, Distt. Kotputli- Behror. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Dinesh Kumar S/o Rajendra Yadav, aged about 28 Years, R/o Bani Jonayacha Police Station, Shahajhapur, District Kotputli Bahror ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ram Prasad for Mr.Mukesh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr.Umesh Vyas JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/12/2025 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing of the impugned F.I.R. No.150/2025, registered at Police Station Behror, District Kotputli-Behror for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(2) & 307 of BNS, 2023, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties. [2025:RJ-JP:49188] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6410/2025] 2. This Court vide order dated 30.10.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer to verify the factum of compromise and the Investigating Officer was further directed to submit the verification report, with regard to the factum of compromise, for perusal of this Court. 4. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer and the complainant has submitted that he does not wish to prosecute the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and in the case of The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. Learned counsel submits that under these circumstances, the proceedings pending against the petitioners may be quashed. 6. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. 7. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and the verification report so furnished by the S.H.O. Police Station Behror, District Kotputtli-Behror as well as looking to the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and now, the complainant does not wish to prosecute the petitioners, and applying the principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 8. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The proceedings of impugned F.I.R. No.150/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:49188] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6410/2025] registered at Police Station Behror, District Kotputtli-Behror against the petitioners stand quashed and set-aside. 9. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /24