[2025:RJ-JP:41382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10168/2025 Sanjeev Garg S/o Late Pritam Chand Garg, Aged About 61 Years, R/o A 13, Model Town Opposite P And T Colony, Jagatpura Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302017. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel (Dop), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 302005 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Energy, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005 3. Chairman, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., (A Government Of Rajasthan Undertaking) Vidyut Bhawan Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur- 302005. 4. Managing Director, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. (A Government Of Rajasthan Undertaking) Vidyut Bhawan Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-302005. 5. Member Secretary/secretary (Admin.), Departmental Promotion Committee (Dcp), Rrvpnl, Vidyut Bhawan Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-302005 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swapnil Singh Patel For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner, a retired Superintending Engineer from RRVPNL primarily on the ground that remarks recorded in his Annual Performance Report (APR) while he was in services were not communicated on time, though [2025:RJ-JP:41382] (2 of 3) [CW-10168/2025] present petitioner was eligible for consideration at the time of DPC for year 2023-2024 for promotion to the post of Additional Chief Enginner (Civil) but was not considered due to one adverse remark in APR of 1991-1992. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the overall rating of present petitioner for the period was found as an average and he was subsequently been promoted but was not considered for promotion for the year 2023-2024, by the DPC. 3. Having considered submission of learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of material placed on record, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to respondent Nos. 3 to 5. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondent Nos. 3 to 5 within a period of two weeks raising all grounds. The respondent Nos. 3 to 5 are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if petitioner is found eligible for consideration by DPC then the matter be considered by organizing a review DPC and his matter for promotion be considered in accordance with applicable rules. [2025:RJ-JP:41382] (3 of 3) [CW-10168/2025] 6. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /42