SRI. ANILKUMAR DESAI S/O KRISHNARAO DESAI v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/101069/2025 · 2025-04-01
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44350 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44350 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5816 WP No. 101069 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 101069 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. ANILKUMAR DESAI S/O. KRISHNARAO DESAI, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. NEERABUDHIHAL VILLAGE, BADAMI TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUSHAL N. K. & SRI. VENKANAGOUDA S. PATIL, ADVS.)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT, DISTRICT BAGALKOT – 01.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SUB-DIVISION, JAMAKHANDI, DISTRICT BAGALKOT – 01.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR BILAGI, TALUK BILAGI, DISTRICT BAGALKOT – 587116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT,
ORDER OR DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-D DATED 19-07- 2024 AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO ENTER THE ASSESSMENT IN COLUMN NO. 4 IN THE RTC PERTAINING TO THE SY NO.87 MEASURING 367.02 ACRES SITUATED AT SIDDAPUR VILLAGE, BILAGI TALUK OF BAGALKOT DISTRICT AS PER THE
ORDER, DATED. 20-11-1959 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5816 WP No. 101069 of 2025
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned AGA for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, submits that the Writ Petition is rendered infructuous as respondent No.3 - The Tahsildar, Bilagi, considered the representation and passed an endorsement dated 28.02.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to challenge the said endorsement dated 28.02.2025. Submission is placed on record. Petition is dismissed as the same is rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the endorsement issued by respondent No.3 – Tahsildar, dated
28.02.2025.
Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE gab CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20