Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.519 of 2025 Sharukh
…..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Karan Singh Dugtal, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.12 of 2025, dated 14.01.2025, under Sections 8/21/22/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Lalkua, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
According to the FIR, on 14.01.2025, narcotic substances were recovered from the possession of the applicant.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the co-accused has already granted bail; the allegedly recovered substance is less than commercial; the applicant is not a pervious convict.
2
5.
Learned State counsel admits these facts.
6.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7.
The bail application is allowed.
8.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
27.03.2025 Sanjay