RAJESH S/O KALLAPPA CHAKADI v. INDRAJIT S/O DEVENDRA PATIL
WP/110991/2017 · 2025-03-11
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44339 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44339 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4582 WP No. 110991 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 110991 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. RAJESH S/O KALLAPPA CHAKADI, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST AND BUSINESS, R/O: 1ST STAGE, RC.NAGAR, BELAGAVI, OFFICE ADDRESS, SRI SAI MULTI-SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, KORVI GALLI, JUNE BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI-590 005. 2. SHIVANAND S/O MADIWALAPPA DODDAMANI, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: R/O: KALAYAN NAGAR, VADGAON, BELAGAVI-590 005, OFFICE ADDRESS, SRI SAI MULTI SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, KORVI GALLI, JUNE BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI-590 005. …PETITIONERS [ABSENT]
AND:
1. INDRAJIT S/O DEVENDRA PATIL, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O: 120 BASTIGALLI, JUNE BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI-590 005. 2. DEVENDRA S/O NEMINATH PATIL, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: 120 BASTIGALLI, JUNE BELAGAVI,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4582 WP No. 110991 of 2017
DIST: BELAGAVI-590 001. 3. SMT.MADHUMATHI S/O DEVENDRA PATIL, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: H/W, R/O: 120 BASTIGALLI, JUNE BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MARUTHI RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2-3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
The petition is listed today for orders and the names of the petitioners are printed/ shown in the cause list. The names of the petitioners are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. The petitioners are absent. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 05.03.2025, on that day, it was ordered that the petitioners were initially represented by counsel Sri.Sachin.S.Magadum. After His Lordship’s elevation, the petitioners have not engaged any counsel. Hence, the office
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4582 WP No. 110991 of 2017
was directed to print the names of the petitioners in the cause list and it was also ordered to be listed on 11.03.2025. Accordingly, the petition is listed today by printing the names of the petitioners in the cause list. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in 2017. Now we are in the month of March 2025. The petition is pending from eight years.
As already noted above, the names of the petitioners are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. They have not engaged counsel to represent them in the Court. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44