Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44337 (AP)

MIRIYAM PALLI VENKATESWARLU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10545/2025 · 2025-04-24

Harinath N

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IV.. [3457 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE V i a A/A PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRUUSTICE HARINATH.N ♦ WRIT PETITION NO: 10545 OF 2025 Between: Miriyam Palli Venkateswarlu, S/o.Guravaiah, aged 52 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. D.No.7-662-L-39 Sivaji Street, Markapur-523316 , Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER JVND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kanigiri Police Station, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. 5. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kanigiri Police Station, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS r Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of “Writ of Mandamus”, declaring the action of Respondents 3 to 5 in interfering with petitioner’s personal life and liberty and in coercing him to withdraw the civil suit in O.S. No.80 of 2024 pending before the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur, without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to summon the petitioner to the Police Station interfere with the petitioners life and liberty except in accordance with law. or lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filedpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with the petitioner’s personal life and liberty by summoning him to appear before the respondent police station. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: APHC010202532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10545/2025 Between: Miriyam Palli Venkateswarlu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1 .VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO.10545 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner .submits that the respondent Nos.3 to 5 are disturbing the peace of the petitioner and that they are trying to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and other third parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondents 3 to 5 are pressurizing the petitioner to with draw the suit filed by him vide OS.No.80 of 2024 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 4. Considering the same, the respondent Nos.3 to 5 are hereby directed to not to disturb the peace of the petitioner and also not to insist to with draw the suit filed by petitioner vide OS.No. 80 of 2024 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur, without following the due of law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed off. process No costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall ^nd closed. Sd/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1- The Principal Secretary, Department Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. [By Special Messenger] 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kanigiri, Prakasam District. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Prakasam District. 5. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kanigiri Police Station District.[2 to 5 by RPAD] 6. One CC to SRI. VENKATA REDDY CHIT 7. Two CCS to GP FOR HOME .High Court Of Andhra 8. Three CD Copies of Home, State of Andhra District. Kanigiri Police Station, Kanigiri Kanigiri, Prakasam TEM Advocate [OPUC] Pradesh. [OUT] ✓ HIGH COURT DATED;25/04/2025 ORDER g( 2 'i SEP 2025 WP.No.10545of2025 •5^O Oj *'»*grrintS«ctio|P^* ? 'vgf, THE WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OFF WITHOUT COSTS