IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) /O’! FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE "F 'S t/. ^ 9 ‘ ” V PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 10835 OF 202^ Between: 1. Oruganti Umavathi, Aged about 41 years W/o. Oruganti Srinivasa Rao, H.No.12-1321/1, Satya Nagar, 4th layout, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Naryanapuram Sobharani, aged 48 years W/o.Narayanapuram Karmika Nagar Chinnamushidiwada, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam. Appanna H.No.4-101/51 Near Sivalayam ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Tahsildar, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. 5. The Village Revenue Officer, Chinamushidivada Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No.5 in contemplating to dispossess the petitioners from their possession and enjoyment of land in Sy.No.163- 163/26356 to an extent of 93.76 Sq.yds and Sy.No. 163-163/7448 to extent of 63.68 Sq.yds Chinnamushidiwada village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without issuing any notice, without conducting any enquiry and without passing any orders as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, mala- fide and against the principles of Natural Justice besides violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and to Consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in any manner including the dispossession from the subject land. one an lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No. 163-163/26356 to extent of 93.76 Sq.yds & Sy.No. 163-163/7448 to an extent of 63.68 Sq.yds Chinnamushidiwada village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. an Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. an Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: .ft APHC010213272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 10835/2025 Between: Oruganti Umavathi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitloner(S): 1 .THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER:- 1. The petitioners claim that they were allotted house site pattas to an extent of 93.76 sq. yards and an extent of 63.68 sq. yards on 16.11.2016 and 13.10.2016 respectively by the 4'^ respondent. It is further case of the petitioners that they have constructed their respective houses over the land allotted to them. 2. It is their further case that while so, the 5'^ respondent tried to interfere with their possession without issuing any notice or without following due process of law. In pursuance thereof, the petitioners claim that they made representations dated 01.01.2025 and 02.04.2025 to the 4*^^ respondent requesting not to dispossess the petitioners from the lands allotted to them and to take action against the 5*^ respondent. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that no action was initiated against the petitioners, if the petitioners violate the conditions of allotment, appropriate action will be taken against them after following the due process of law. In view of the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the present Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners 3. 4. V except in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-VENUGOPALA RAO assistant RE9iSTRAR - SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Tahsildar, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. 5. The Village Revenue Officer, Chinamushidivada Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam. 6. One CC to Sri. Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 8. ThreeCD Copies [OUT] vna HIGH COURT DATED:25/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10835 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS