[2025:RJ-JP:49337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19009/2025 Babali Kumari Daughter Of Shri Bhanwar Lal Pareek, Widow Of Late Shri Ram Pareek, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Village Bilanderpur Via Khejroli, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19070/2025 Rubina Yadav D/o Surender Singh, W/o Late Kamal Singh Yadav, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Plot No. 4, Tehsildar Colony, Jaipur Road, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrant Sepat Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narain with Mr. Manish Bhardwaj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. These writ petitions raises a common question in relation to difficulty faced by the petitioner(s) while filing an application form pursuant to advertisement dated 06.11.2025 on the post of [2025:RJ-JP:49337] (2 of 5) [CW-19009/2025] Primary School Teacher (General/Sanskrit-Education) (Level I, Class I to V). 2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19009/2025 is preferred with following prayer:- i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direction the respondents to accept the online/offline application form of petitioner and allow the petitioner for appearing in further selection process pursuant to advertisement dated 06.11.2025 and given appointment to petitioner on the post of Teacher Grade-III, Level-I in the larger interest of justice. ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to given appointment to petitioner on the post of Teacher Grade-III, Level-I pursuant to advertisement No.08/2025 dated 06.11.2025 in the larger interest of justice. 3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19070/2025 is preferred with following prayer:- i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby directing the Respondent Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, to forthwith allow the Petitioner, Smt. Rubina Yadav, to fill up and submit her online/offline application form for the post of Teacher Gr.III Level I (Elementary/Sanskrit Education) pursuant to the advertisement No.08/2025 dated 06.11.2025. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, Direct the Respondents to provisionally accept the Petitioner’s candidature and allow her to participate in the entire selection process including the written examination and document verification for the post of Teacher Gr.III [2025:RJ-JP:49337] (3 of 5) [CW-19009/2025] Level I (Elementary/Sanskrit Education) and if petitioner find place in merit then consider her for appointment. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner Babali Kumari submits that the name of present petitioner in education document is Babali Kumari, whereas the name in Aadhar Card is Babali Pareek. He also submits that the name of father of petitioner is Bhanwar Lal Pareek and she is widow of Shri Ram Pareek. He also submits that due to surname/family name, the name “Pareek” has been mentioned in Aadhar Card, whereas same is not mentioned in certificates related to educational qualifications. He also submits that all efforts made by the petitioner to correct the details of Aadhar Card have failed, so petitioner has filed this writ petition to invoke the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Rubina Yadav submits that the name of present petitioner in educational documents is Rubina Yadav, whereas at the time of marriage, the name of petitioner was changed to Rashmi and same has been reflected in Aadhar Card, but despite efforts by the petitioner to change her Aadhar details, she was not able to get corrected said details and as a result of which, the petitioner is unable to fill-up application pursuant to the advertisement issued by the respondent. 6. Learned counsel for respondent, Mr. Nalin G. Narain accepts notices and he submits that petitioners are negligent themselves, so they are only responsible as they have not approached the UDAI Authority, well in advance when such situation has arisen, and now, when the last date is fastly approaching they are before [2025:RJ-JP:49337] (4 of 5) [CW-19009/2025] this Hon’ble Court for issuance of writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 7. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and considering the genuineness and the bona fide in the claims made by the petitioners, it appears that due to certain discrepancies in the name as mentioned in the certificates relating to educational qualification and the Aadhar Card, the OTP is not generated to enable them to complete One Time Registration process as mandated by respondent, therefore, the petitioners, who have a right to enforce Right of Equality vis-a-vis other candidates, cannot be discriminated on the ground that they have failed to update Aadhar Card details in accordance with their educational certificates. 8. In view of the problems as mentioned by the petitioners in the writ petitions and in order to balance to equities, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petitions with following directions:- (i) The respondent shall permit the online application of petitioner(s) without Aadhar authentication, offcourse subject to verificastion of identity of petitioner(s) to be ascertained from the documents submitted by the petitioner(s). (ii) Alternatively, the respondent may permit the petitioner(s) to file an offline application, if any, online application is not successful as suggested hereinabove. (iii) The petitioner(s) are directed to remain present at 10.30 AM on 05.12.2025 for further direction by the Secretary, RSSB at Campus of RSSB, Jaipur with all relevant original documents and self- attested copies as required in the application form. [2025:RJ-JP:49337] (5 of 5) [CW-19009/2025] 9. With aforesaid, the writ petitions, misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /315-316