-1- 2025:CGHC:18829 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 34 of 2014 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Ps Mandir Hasaud, Raipur, Distt Raipur, Cg, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Executive Engineer, Minimata Bango Water Management No.6, Sakti, Ps Sakit, Distt Janjgir Champa, Cg, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Sub Miner Sub Division No.3, Nandelibhata, Sakti, Ps Sakti, Distt Janjgir Champa, Cg, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Raghunath Kashyap, S/o Ghasiya Kashyap, Aged About 40 Years Ex. Labour, R/o Post Pendri, Ps Sakti, Distt Janjgir Champa, Cg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Presiding Officer, Under The I.D.Act, Labour Court, Janjgir Champa, Distt Janjgir Champa, Cg, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner/State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.1 : Mr. KPS Gandhi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 25.04.2025 1) The petitioners/State have challenged the award passed by the learned Labour Court, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) in Case 161/I.D.Act/2013/Reference dated 29.10.2013 whereby the order of termination of services was set aside and respondent was reinstated in service without payment of back wages. 2) Mr. Lav Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/petitioners would fairly submit that services of respondent have been regularized vide order dated 17.10.2019. He would contend that the award passed by the learned Labour Court has already been complied with. 3) On the other hand, Mr. Gandhi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 would submit that as the services of respondent No.1 have already been regularized, nothing survives for adjudication. 4) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the records. 5) Taking into consideration the fact that pursuant to the award passed by the learned Labour Court dated 30.10.2013, services of the respondent have been regularized vide order dated 17.10.2019; therefore, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the findings recorded by the learned Labour Court. Consequently, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No order as to cost(s) Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim