Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./36450/2025 · 2025-06-16
Chandra Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44322 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44322 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36450 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-558 Year-2024 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev yadav son of Hiraman yadav @ Hiraman Rai Resident of village - Jaisinghpur Chiutahi, Ps- Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 16-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 558 of 2024 dated 29.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 220 litres of illicit spirit was recovered from the baswari.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36450 of 2025(2) dt.16-06-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has 12 criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 558 of 2024, with a condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
shivam/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T