Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44320 (PNJ)

AMIT v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/10234/2025 · 2025-04-08

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 142 CWP-10234-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.04.2025 Amit ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. V.S. Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner(s). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Challenge in the present petition is to the notice/announcement dated 14.07.2024 qua ESP (Gen.) category issued by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission wherein the candidates having less marks than the petitioner have been declared selected, ignoring his claim. 2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that as regards his grievances mentioned in the petition, the petitioner(s) has already sent a representation dated 03.12.2024 (Annexure P-11) to respondent No.2-the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission and he would be satisfied in case the said respondent is directed to consider and decide the said representation by passing a well reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.09 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 142 CWP-10234-2025 (O&M) 4. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and submits that she has no objection to the aforesaid prayer being granted. 5. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is accordingly disposed of without commenting on the merits of the present case and with a direction to respondent No.2-the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission to take note of the representation dated 03.12.2024 (Annexure P-11) sent by the petitioner and to pass a well reasoned and speaking order thereupon after granting an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties in accordance with law and preferably within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 08.04.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.09 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document