S. No. 41 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case No: - SWP No. 597/2013 Darshan Lal …. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs State and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: None Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 25.02.2025 The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 3rd of December, 2013 and same is the position as on today. During this intervening period, there was no effort on part of the petitioners to get the instant petition listed. An inference can be drawn at this stage that either the petitioners have lost interest in prosecution the instant petition any further or with the efflux of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid backdrop, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution along with connected application(s), if any. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 25.02.2025 Manan