17 01.5.2025 Ct. No. 8 SB FMA 693 of 2025 CAN 2 of 2025 Basudeb Hati Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Tapan Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Somnath Naskar … for the State 1. The appellant is not represented. 2. However, we are satisfied with the reason for delay in preferring the appeal and accordingly we condone the delay of 126 days in preferring the appeal. 3. The application being CAN 2 of 2025 is disposed of. 4. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and gone through the impugned order. 5. In view of the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench on 11.1.2021 and that the life time arrear pension was paid to the petitioner on the basis of the probate obtained by the appellant / petitioner on 24.7.2023, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single. 6. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Smita Das De, J)