[2025:RJ-JP:48916] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15670/2025 Amit Kumar Jangid S/o Ramswaroop Jangid, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gram Chota Gudda Gudaliya, Post Govindgarh, Tehsil Chomu, P.s. Govindgarh District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP Mr. Sameer Khan Mr. Tanveera HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.44/2025 registered at Police Station Lal Kothi, District Jaipur City (East) for offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the present case, the parties have entered into a compromise and according to compromise, the complainant has got his electronic items as well as balance amount. He argued that co-accused Vikas Jangid has been enlarged on bail by this Court on [2025:RJ-JP:48916] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15670/2025] 20.11.2025, the offence is exclusively triable by Magistrate. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 10.11.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time and no further custodial interrogation is required, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has acceded to the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also factum of compromise and submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is granted bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Amit Kumar Jangid S/o Ramswaroop Jangid, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /5