[2025:RJ-JP:44880] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17003/2025 1. Dinesh Singh Thakur S/o Ghirwar Singh Thakur, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Bhraman-Thakur Basti, Viloni, Tehsil Sarmathura, District Dholpur (Rajasthan). 2. Sirmohar Khushwa S/o Parimal Kushwa, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Bhraman-Thakur Basti, Viloni, Tehsil Sarmathura, District Dholpur (Rajasthan). 3. Devicharan Vyas S/o Motilal Vyas, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Viloni, Thesil Sarmathura, District Dholpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector Cum District Magistrate, Dholpur. 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Sarmathura, District Dholpur. 4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sarmathura, District Dholpur. 5. Village Development Officer, Panchayat Smiti Viloni, Panchayat Samiti Sarmathura, District Dholpur. 6. Administrator, Panchayat Samiti Viloni, Panchayat Samiti Sarmathura, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashishtha For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 10/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are residing upon the plot in question by raising construction of residential houses from last so many decades. Learned counsel has placed on record the documents such as Ration Card as well as electricity bills to establish their long [2025:RJ-JP:44880] (2 of 2) [CW-17003/2025] possession. Learned counsel further submits that in a drive for removal of encroachments by the respondent authorities, the respondent authorities are proceeding to demolish their residential houses, which is the only place for shelter for the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners requests that the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent authorities to consider their representation in a fair & objective manner and without discrimination. 3. The limited prayer so made on behalf of the petitioners deserves acceptance. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners to submit a detailed representation along with all the required documents before the respondent authorities, making a request so made in the present writ petition. 5. The respondent No.6 - Administrator, Gram Panchayat Viloni, Panchayat Samiti Sarmathura, Distt. Dholpur, is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order after granting opportunity of hearing to the ptitioners. 6. In the meantime, till final decision is taken upon the petitioners' representation, no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioners. 7. It is made clear that directions contained in this order shall not be construed to decide the petitioner’s representation in a particular way and the action is required to be taken in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J PAYAL DHAWAN /6