1 2025:CGHC:48467 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 5038 of 2025 Dashrath Singh S/o Dev Chand Aged About 42 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Podipa, Tahsil Latori, P.S. Jainagar, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue) Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Bahadur S/o Ranjeet Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Podipa, Tahsil Latori, P.S. Jainagar, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Alam S/o Ranjeet Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Podipa, Tahsil Latori, P.S. Jainagar, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Hriday S/o Prasad Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Podipa, Tahsil Latori, P.S. Jainagar, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate For State-respondent : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. GA 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 22/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, petitioner sought following relief(s) : “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue notices to the respondents returnable within early date of hearing. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Direct the respondent no.2 & 3 to consider and decide the representation moved by the petitioner in accordance with Law within stipulated period. 10.3 Grant any other relief(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which deemed fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.4 Cost of the petition.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner Annexure P-3 dated 21.08.2025, within any specified time frame in accordance with law/rules. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that she is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner Annexure P/3, expeditiously, in accordance with relevant rule/law/regulation, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent Nos. 4 to 6. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant