Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44299 (RAJ)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. M/S MANDA DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED

CRW/33/2025 · 2025-10-31

Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43740-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Review Petition No. 33/2025 In D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.300/2023 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Baran (Raj.). 2. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Kota Zone, Kota. 3. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division Second, Chhabra, District Baran (Raj.). ----Appellant/Petitioners Versus M/s Manda Developers And Builders Private Limited, Shiv Shakti Vihar, Opposite 220 K.V. Power House, Jaipur Road, Bikaner-334001 Through Power Of Attorney Holder Hardayal Singh (General Manager Technical), S/o Shri Kripal Singh, Aged About 77 Years, R/o B-2/2, Patel Nagar, Bikaner (Rajasthan) Mr. Sumit Manda S/o Shri Hari Ram Manda, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 202, Shubh Ratan Platinum, Bani Park, Jaipur Presently I And Director And Authorized Person ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : None Present HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 31/10/2025 1. By way of this review petition, learned counsel seeks review of our order dated 21.08.2025. However, we notice that in our order dated 21.08.2025, we have examined the case of the petitioners and found that the claim was not severable. [2025:RJ-JP:43740-DB] (2 of 2) [CRW-33/2025] 2. In the present review petition, the petitioners have again asserted that the claim was severable. 3. The submissions do not come within the scope of the review, the review petition is accordingly dismissed. 4. All pending applications also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ GAURAV/2