[2025:RJ-JP:42995] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2504/2025 Ram Kishan Gothwal S/o Virda Ram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Nangal Khoria, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli- Behror (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, (Secondary Education), Bikaner (Raj.) 3. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Jaipur Region, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Chief District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Alwar. 5. Chief Block Education Officer, Neemrana, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Sharma for Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rohan for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. Mr. Rohan for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is entitled for promotion but his case is not considered as [2025:RJ-JP:42995] (2 of 2) [CW-2504/2025] representation submitted by him is still pending for consideration before respondent No.2. 4. Learned counsel for respondent assures that if any representation is pending before the department, it shall be considered at earliest and if petitioner submits a fresh representation, same will also be considered by the department in accordance with the rules and prevalent guidelines. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to the respondent No.2 within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the representation in light of grounds and rules but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondent no.2 is under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /36