Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44296 (PNJ)

MADAN PAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/10124/2025 · 2025-04-08

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 CWP-10124-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.04.2025 Madan Pal ...Petitioner VERSUS The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Mahavir Singh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Challenge in the present petition is to the charge-sheet dated 30.07.2024 as well as the impugned order dated 24.02.2025 and a further prayer has also been made for issuance of directions to the respondent- authority for staying the operation of the order dated 24.02.2025 till the decision of the instant petition. 2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as regards his grievances mentioned in the petition, the petitioner has already served a legal notice dated 01.03.2025 (Annexure P- 13) upon the respondent(s) and he would be satisfied in case the Director General State Transport, Haryana is directed to consider and decide the said legal notice by passing a well reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.09 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 133 CWP-10124-2025 (O&M) 4. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that she has no objection to the aforesaid prayer being granted. 5. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is accordingly disposed of without commenting on the merits of the present case and with a direction to the Director General State Transport, Haryana to take note of the legal notice dated 01.03.2025 (Annexure P-13) served by the petitioner and to pass a well reasoned and speaking order thereupon after granting an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties in accordance with law and preferably within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 08.04.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.09 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document