4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA , WRIT PETITION NO: 14609 OF 2025 Between: Kavuluri Raja Chandramouli, S/o. Kutumba Rao, Occ. Agriculture, Aged about 46 years, R/o. H.No. 1-31, Korlamanda Village, Vissannapeta Mandal, NTR District, Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, NTR District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nuzivedu, NTR District. 4. The Tahsildar, Vissannapeta Mandal, NTR District. 5. The Village Revenue Officer, KorlamandaVillage, Vissannapeta Mandal NTR District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and seeking to dispossess/evict him from the land admeasuring Ac.2.00 Cents may in r Sy.No.263/2 in Korlamanda Village, Vissannapeta Mandal NTR District, without issuing any notice, without giving any opportunity, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, violation of the principles of natural justice discriminatory and violative of the Fundamental contrary to law. and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the aforesaid land. lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances m support of the writ petition, the High Court may to interfere with the petitioner land in Korlamanda Village, pending disposal of the above writ be pleased to direct the respondents not admeasuring Ac.2.00 Cents Vissannapeta Mandal, NTR District petition. in Sy. No.263/2 Counsel for the PetitionerSRI T VENU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER r / € f ^PHC010296002025 / ./ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMS / [3329] / THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14609/2025 getween: Kavuiuri Raja Chandramouli ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: TT VEND GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): TOP for revenue The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) The ( \ V 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14609/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and seeking to dispossess/evict him from the land admeasuring Ac. 2.00 Cents in Sy. No.263/2 in Korlamanda Village, Vissannapeta Mandal, NTR District without issuing any notice, without giving any opportunity as arbitrary, Illegal, unjust, violation of the principles of natural justice, contrary to law, discriminatory and violative of the Fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and conseguently direct the respondents not to dispossess with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the aforesaid land and pass such other order.” 2. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the case, requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents not to dispossess and not to interfere / / y with the petitioner’s subject property, without following due process \ of law. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property the respondents would follow due process of law. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents, it is observed that when the petitioner is in settled possession and enjoyment of the subject property, he cannot be dispossessed, without following due process of law in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in “Rame Gowda (dead) by LRs. V. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs^’. Therefore, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents are directed not to dispossess and not to interfere with petitioners subject property, except by following due process of law. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. the As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ■>2004(1) see 769 section ofbcer \ Sd/-P ^ assistant //TRUE COPY// To, of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 1. The Principal Secretary, State Secretariat Buildings 2. The District Collector, NTR District. Divisional Officer, Nuzivedu, NTR District. 3. The Revenue 4. The Tahsildar, Vissannapeta Mandal, NTR District. # 5. The Village Revenue Officer, KorlamandaVillage, Vissannapeta Mandal NTR District. 6. OneCCto SRI. T VEND GOPAL Advocate [OPUC] 7. TwoCCsto GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 8. Three CD Copies [OUT] nm HIGH COURT DATED: 19/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.14609 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS