CHHOTURAM BIJRANIYA S/O SHRI KANARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2275/2024 · 2025-11-14
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45994] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2275/2024
1. Chhoturam Bijraniya S/o Shri Kanaram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Mangrasi, Post Jana, Via Losal, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 2. Jitendra Kumar Choudhary S/o Pappuraj, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village And Post Bahravanda, Tehsil Bahravanda, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 3. Rampal S/o Puran Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gunsar, Post Palpur, Kotkasim, District Alwar (Rajasthan). 4. Ratan Lal Choudhary S/o Laxman Choudhary, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bid Lunera, Post Dehlod, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Rajasthan). 5. Banwari Lal Meena S/o Hanuman Prasad Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village 221 Bhakto Ka Mohalla, Mukam Post Boraj, Tehsil Maujmabad, District Dudu. 6. Jitendra Singh Rajot S/o Shri Khushal Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Pratap Nagar, Ward No. 03, Village Jasol, Tehsil Pachpadra,, District Balotara (Rajasthan). 7. Surendra Singh S/o Shri Rajendra Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Post Hansasar, Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 8. Mohan Lal Bairwa S/o Shri Prabhudayal Bairwa, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Gumanpura, Post Madhogarh, Tehsil Tunga, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). 9. Sanju Saini D/o Shri Ramsingh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Palanheda, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 10. Chhogaram S/o Prahladram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post Jogapura, Tehsil Shivganj, District Sirohi (Rajasthan). 11. Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Imloha, Post Shyampura, Tehsil Patan, District Neemkathana (Rajasthan). 12. Kamlesh Mavi S/o Shri Hemant Mavi, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Jata Rawat Ka Pada, Post Sukhaniya, Tehsil And District Banswara (Rajasthan). 13. Bhawani Singh Meena S/o Rewarmal Meena, Aged About
[2025:RJ-JP:45994] (2 of 5) [CW-2275/2024] 35 Years, R/o Daulatpura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa (Rajasthan). 14. Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Dalip Kumar, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Vpo 6 Dd, Tehsil Ghadsana, District Sriganganagar. 15. Bhagwanaram S/o Shri Shaludaram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kumharo Ka Vas, Umedpur, Jalore (Rajasthan). 16. Gori Shankar S/o Jagram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village
Rangmahal,
Tehsil
Suratgarh,
District Sriganganagar. 17. Satveer Singh S/o Indraj Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Dholpaliya, Post Kalana, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. 18. Virendra Singh S/o Jaidev Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 20, Village Bhabhana, Tehsil Kareda, District Bhilwara (Rajasthan). 19.
Bhavani Shankar Tard S/o Haramana Ram Tard, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Surana, Tehsil Lunkaransar, District Bikaner. 20. Mukesh Kumar Paliwal S/o Shri Devilal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Suthar Madra, Post Rao Madra, Tehsil Gogunda, District Udaipur (Rajasthan). 21. Manoj Kumar Dhaka S/o Khinva Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sadu Chhoti, Tehsil Bidasar, District Churu (Rajasthan). 22. Hansa Devi Yadav D/o Ram Lal Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bawdi Gopinath, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. 23. Ramesh Chand Yadav S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Dhani Balaji Ki, Village Bhanipura, Post Raipur Jagir, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 24. Jugraj Singh Hada S/o Shri Narayan Singh Hada, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Badfu, Post Lambakhoh, Tehsil Taleda, District Bundi (Rajasthan). 25. Deshraj S/o Shri Lalchand, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Near American Gate, Achhnera Road, Balveer Nagar, Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 26. Rekha Kumari Sharma D/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, W/o Krishankant, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Dhanipura,
[2025:RJ-JP:45994] (3 of 5) [CW-2275/2024] Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 27. Anita Dixit D/o Narendra Dixit, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Keshav Ka Bas, Post Dansroli, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 28. Gulab Singh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Near Gram Panchayat Bhawan, Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Panchayat Road No. 1, New Gram Panchayat 1 L M, Bhopalpura, Ganganagar, Rajasthan. 29. Nemichand Meena S/o Nahar Mal Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 29, Jainiyon Ka Mandir, Village And Post Benar, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur. 30. Maina Sahu D/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Khejran Dikhnada, Tehsil Bhanipura, District Churu (Rajasthan). 31. Nitesh Sharma S/o Devkinandan Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Chonp, Tehsil Amer, Lodha Ki Dhani, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, School Education And Bhasha, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3.
The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghooghra Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhavya Kala for Mr. Devansh Sharma Mr. Raghav Sharma for Mr. Samit Bishnoi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/11/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:45994] (4 of 5) [CW-2275/2024]
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“I). The respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioners for the post of Lecturer (School Education) for subject Hindi under General, OBC, SC, ST, MBC and pursuant to EWS Category advertisement dated 28.04.2022 by awarding them bonus marks for all disputed questions correctly answered by the petitioners and if the petitioners are stand in merit to be allowed them appointment on the post of Lecturer Education) (School in their respective category with all consequential service benefits. ii). The respondents may also be directed to expert subject committee to examine the correct answer of the disputed a questions of Paper-I & II for the post of Lecturer Hindi. (School Education) of subject iii). Any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioners along with cost of writ petition.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioner smay be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to
[2025:RJ-JP:45994] (5 of 5) [CW-2275/2024] consider and decide the representation considering their about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation.
After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /410