Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44284 (RAJ)

RAKESH MEENA S/O MANGILAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18112/2025 · 2025-11-26

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48133] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18112/2025 1. Rakesh Meena S/o Mangilal Meena, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Dobdi Post Digod Tehsil Sangod District Kota (Rajasthan) At Present Working On The Post Of Constable At Reserve Police Line District Kota (Rural) Belt No. 1203. 2. Ashok Kumar S/o Gordhan Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Nagla Harsukh Post Bijwari Tehsil Weir District Bharatpur At Present Working On The Post Of Constable At Reserve Police Line District Kota (Rural) Belt No. 1023. 3. Pushpendra Choudhary S/o Kaluaa Choudhary, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Bikru Post Akhaigarh Tehsil Nadbai District Bharatpur At Present Working On The Post Of Constable At Police Station Ananatpura, Kota (Urban) Belt No. 1601 4. Navindra Kumar Jha S/o Brahmdev Jha, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Saraswati Colony, Roteda Road, Gali No. 10, Kota Junction Pin 324002 At Present Working On The Post Of Constable At Reserve Police Line, Kota (Urban) Belt No. 1600 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary (Home) Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Inspector General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Superintendent Of Police, Kota (Rural) District Kota (Rajasthan) 5. Superintendent Of Police, Kota (Urban) (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.C. Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: [2025:RJ-JP:48133] (2 of 3) [CW-18112/2025] “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and (i)to issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the Respondents be directed to given service benefits seniority, ACP, Pay Scale, due arrears, Fixation and monitory benefits alongwith regularization service with effect from the date when their junior person and similarly situated person granting are so appointed on the post of Constable General since the year 2011-12 to the petitioners. (ii)to issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby directed to respondents to make fixation of salary, give all service, seniority and other monitory and consequential benefits to the petitioners on the post of Constable General from the year 2011-2012. Any other appropriate order or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 25.07.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11661/2024: Dinesh Chand Saini & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Dinesh Chand Saini (supra) and Dara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. [2025:RJ-JP:48133] (3 of 3) [CW-18112/2025] 11973/2012, decided on 17.12.2012 passed by this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, if applicable upon facts of the case. 4. It is hereby clarified that we have not verified the veracity of facts as mentioned in the petition, however, the respondents are at liberty to deviate, if there is veracity in facts claimed by petitioners. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /125