IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY. THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10471 OF 2025 Between: Kakumuru Venkat Reddy, S/o. K. Sudhakar Reddy, Aged about 39 Occ Business, R/o.Ramalayam Street, Patapadu, Chejerla Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, years, ...Petitioner/S AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by it's Principal Secretary (Home), State Secretariat Buildings, Veligapudi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The Superintendent of police, Chejerla Mandal at Chejerla, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Station House officer, Chejerla Police Station, Chejerla Mandal,SPSR Nellore District ...Respondent/s Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order, direction or a writ more particularly a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents, especially the second and third respondents, to produce the petitioner's brother Mr. Kakumuru Rajiv Reddy, S/o. K. Sudhakar Reddy, Aged about 41 years. Permanent Resident of Ramalayam Street ■OS Patapadu, Chejerla Mandal.SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh currently residing at Hyderabadin. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRi: JETTI SANTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: APHC010208442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ [3535] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10471/2025 Between: Kakumuru Venkat Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.JETTI SANTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: (perHon’ble Sh Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) ...RESPONDENT{S) Sri J. Santhi Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has .bfconse infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P VINOD KUMAR asIistantre^trar SECTION //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI. JETTI SANTHI KIRAN Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Throo nn Conies I HIGH COURT E DATED:23/04/2025 i? O' I n SEP 2025 ^ Current Section . ^ m; ORDER WP.No.10471 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS