Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:71109 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12836 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rizwnullah Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and perused the record. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Case No. T. 202415090204828 of 2024 (L.M.C. Secretary/Lekhpal Versus Taufeeq) T 202415090204827(Lekhpal Versus Sabbir, T 202415090204832 (Lekhpal Versus Sukhram) T 202415090204830(Lekhpal Versus Bubhan and others) T2024150904829(Lekhpal Versus Sanaur), T202415090204831(Lekhpal Verses Israeel) (Under Section 67 of U.P. R.C.2006, (Under Section 67 of U.P. R.C.2006 within a stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, so that justice may be done." 3. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that by means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to decide six different cases pending under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the petitioner is not a party in any of those proceedings, therefore, the proceedings cannot be expedited at his behest. 4. In view of these facts, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. Since the proceedings are pending, it is expected that the same shall be decided in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad