IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4601 OF 2025 Between: 1. Rimmalapudi Govinda Raju, S/o.Late. Rimmalapudi Veeraju Aged about 55 years Occ. Business, R/o 68-10-1, Near Vinayaka Temple Viduyuth Nagar, Kakinada, Kakinada District. Andhra Pradesh-533003. ’ O^rongly men^oned in FIR as Rimmalapudi Govinda Chowd Correct Rimmalapudi Govinda Raju) 2. Konujula Veera Venkata Rajasekhar, S/o Sriramulu, aged about. 51 years, Occ. Business, R/o 2-84/1, Rangampeta Mandalam VTC Peda Rayavaram, East Godavari District Andhra Pradesh-533291 (Wrongly rnentioned in FIR as Rayavarapu Sekhar Correct Veera Venkata Rajasekhar) name is name is Konujula ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED AND Hkfh Rspresented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati. 2. Kanakala Srikanth, S/o. Subrahmanyeswara Rao Aged about 32 ^ari Street, Peddapuram Kakinada, Kakinada District., Andhra Pradesh years. Town, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 138/2025 of PS Peddapuram, Kakinada. the High Court may LA. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the _GifCumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^ High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in . 138/2025 of PS Peddapuram, Kakinada. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K.B. Ramanna Dora, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2. on The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010217782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) •I [3457] y MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4601 of 2025 Between: Rimmalapudi Govinda Raju and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED{S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitloner/accused(S): 1.KB RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are arraigned as Accused Nos.1 & 2 in Crime No. 138 of 2025 on the file of the Peddapuram Police Station, Kakinada District registered for the offences punishable under Section 108 read with 56, 308(2), 351(1) read with 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 1. 2. It is submitted that the respondent No.2 has filed a false complaint alleging that the petitioners committed offences under various Sections of law- It is submitted that father finance from the of the petitioners by mortgaging their respondent No.2 have obtained property in favour of the petitioners that the said Capital Finance petitioners and it has come to the knowledge of the property was already Company for mortgaged with the Profectus a sum of Rs. 1,20,00,000/-. purpose appears to have borrowed The 2^"^ respondent for business money from several persons. The petitioners having come to know of the same, requested the 2'^^ respondent to from all the creditors i ond 2 respondent, his father and repay the loan amount. It appears in view of the demands in the village, the family of the 2''^ respondent i.e., the committed suicide and were taken to hospital and mother decided to Tablets. They had consumed Zolpidem were discharged on the 3- It is submitted petitioners, the they same day. that the only for parents of 2'""' pressurizing and to threaten the respondent and the 2'^'^ respondent have resorted to consume the alleged tablets. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that cannot be made the allegations out on the said facts under Section 108 circumstances. and 5. Heard learned Assistant Public Considering the fact discharged peddapuram to Prosecutor. 6. that the parents of the 2'^’^ shall be investigation against the respondent were a direction to the SHO petitioners without on the same day, there complete the i taking any coercive steps. It does not prevent the lO/SHO from filing the final report or charge sheet. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. 7. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-N.NAGAMMA assistant registrar Section officer Police Station, Kakinada //true copy// To, Officer Peddapuram rAMANNA DORA Advocate [OPUC] prosecutor. High Court of Andhra Pradesh at 1. The Station House District. . *" 2#0he CC to SRI. K B Tw6' CC "to Pub^c Amaravathrv 4. TwcrGD Copies 3. Chp CHP HIGH COURT DATED:28/04/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4601 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION