Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49388] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11782/2025 Jaivendra S/o Harkishan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Dehra Melak, Police Station Sed Nagli District Amroha (U.P.) Currently Resident Glen Sky Factory Barudhan, Police Station Taleda, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bundi) ----Applicant Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Abhishek Jhingonia For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 04/12/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 0206/2025 registered at Police Station Talera District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is 36 years of age and is the sole breadwinner of his family. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed. It is contended that no specific role has been attributed to the applicant, whereas a specific role has been assigned to co- accused Shovindra, and the cause of death is attributed to be an injury caused by a wooden plank/ fanti. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against
[2025:RJ-JP:49388] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11782/2025] him. Learned counsel also submits that, in view of Section 183 of the BNSS, the statements of Deepak and Karan Singh is not supportive of the story as tendered by the prosecution.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the applicant is sole breadwinner of his family; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that no specific role has been attributed to the applicant, whereas a specific role has been assigned to co-accused Shovindra and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Jaivendra S/o Harkishan shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/37