IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction^"^ I m\ o TwewTr rfth day oft'ii TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY® ■hA present the honourable DR JUSTICE VENKATA ^^S^BilPillllON NO; JYOTHIRIWAI pratapa^ 34102 OF ?ni« Between: D. igudem, ■..Petitioner AND 2. The I District.Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Vijayawada, Krishna Rajahmundry, East District. Secretary and Goda'llri Dls{ri7"‘ °f Collegiate Education 4- The District Educational ^ "Th© R D o ■co.esponden%ra- Officer, Eluru, East Godavari by its -Respondents Petition under Article ffie circumstances stated i ,f^ Constitution , nature of Writ Of Mandamus compieting the of India praying that in tbe High Court may particularly one in the of the Respondents in not post of lecturer in more declaring the action process of selection of S C Back log zoology in 5th 2nd Respondenti respondent college In R.C. No. 292/Admn1 as per the permission -1/2011 dt- 19-11 accorded by the -2012. notified by interview on 20-05- consequently direct the 5th Respondent 2015 so far on 12-12-2012. as illegal arbitrary having conducted i and unconstitutional and the respondents to finalize the selection process in respect of the said post and fill up the said post with petitioner being the more meritorious candidate lA NO: 1 OF 2018 > . Petition under Section 151- CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to finalize the selection process in respect of the SC Backlog Post of Lecturer in Zoology in the 5th Respondent college as notified on 12-12-2012 and as far the interview held on 20-05-2015 and fill up the said post with the petitioner being a more meritorious candidate pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GUDISEVA VENKATA SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.5: None The Court made the following: Order 1 APHC010707102018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34102/2018 Between: G. Mounika ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GUDISEVA VENKATA SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: ...RESPONDENT(S) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “ fo issue a Writ, order or direction more particulariy one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not completing the process of selection of S.C Back log post of lecturer in zoology in 5^^respondent college as per the permission accorded by the 2''^Respondent in R.C.No.292/Admn1-1/2011 dt.19-11-2012. notified by the 5^^Respondent on 12-12-2012, having conducted interview on 20-05-2015 so far as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to finalize the selection process in respect of the said post and fill up the said post with petitioner being the more meritorious candidate and to pass such other order or orders ” 2. Heard Sri. Gudiseva Venkata petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4. Sai Kiran, learned counsel for the for Higher Education appearing 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a direction may be process of selection of SC given to the respondent authorities to complete the backlog post of Lecturer in Zoology in the college of 5 respondent, since the counsel would further submit that the post is notified on 12.12.2012. Learned respondents have conducted interview the selection on 20.05.2015 and not yet concluded process. A direction may be given to the the said post with the petitioner. respondents to fill up 4. Learned Government Pleader for the petitioner possessed Post Graduation NET/SLET/Ph.D Education (CE.I-1) Department, eligible for the post of Lecturer i Pleader would further submit that after notice of the Management that only four within stipulated time and the other two date. But the office staff i Accordingly, the interview which the said irregularity. Learned Government the petition. Higher Education would submit that not pass No.47 Higher petitioner is not Degree only and she did per the UGC regulations 2010 and G.O.Ms. dated 14.05.2007. The , as in degree colleges. Learned Government conducting the interview, it came to the out of six applications were received applications were received after cut-off for interview, was cancelled due to Pleader finally prays for dismissal inadvertently called all the candidates was held on 20.05.2015 of 3 Considering the submissions made and a fair look at the material 5. placed on record, there is no dispute about the fact that the respondent authorities issued a notification to fill up the post of Lecturer in Zoology under SC backlog quota. Thereafter, basing on the order of the 2"^ respondent, the 3'^'^ respondent/Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Guntur conducted enquiry and submitted report vide his letter dated 21.03.2016, according to which, none of the candidates applied for the said post possess NET/SLET/Ph.D, therefore, no candidate was selected in the interview. Though the 5'^ respondent college notified the vacancy in newspapers and conducted interviews for the post of Lecturer in Zoology, the Committee constituted for the purpose did not select any candidate for different reasons, respondent reviewed the matter and noticed that the candidates appeared before the Selection Committee for interview do not possess requisite qualification of NET/SLET/Ph.D and they only possessed the qualification of PG only. After reviewing the matter, the respondent authorities came to the conclusion to direct the Management of the College to nd Thereafter, the 2 notify the vacancy afresh. In view of the above discussion, the petitioner is not eligible for appointment to the post of Lecturer in Degree Colleges. The writ petition is devoid of merits, as the petitioner does not have the requisite qualification. Accordingly, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 6. 4 7. In the result, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER >:"'Dne CC to SRI GUDISEVA VENKATA SAI KIRAN Advocate [OPUC] ^ education (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh 3. Three CD Copies To, gsg HIGH COURT DATED; 25/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.34102 of 2018 DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS