IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 33680 OF 2022 Between: f. Kasara Gopi, S/o Jayaramaiah, aged about 50 Years, R/o D.No.2-124A Marrimandha BC Colony, Papanaidu Peta Post Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Capital City, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 3. The Joint Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati. • t 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikalahasti Revenue Division, Srikalahasti, Tirupati District. 5. The Tahsildar, Renigunta Mandal, Renigunta, Tirupati District. 6. S Alfonse Devadoss (DIED) as per L.R R7, S/o Souri Nathan, C/o Tahsildar, Renigunta Mandal, Renigunta, Tirupati District 7. A Susheela, W/o Alfonse Devadoss, R/o 17-69, Old Check Post; Renigunta, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh. R7 Is brought on record as L.R of the deceased respondent no.6 as per the Court's order dt.03.03.2025 in I.A.No. 01 of 2025 in Writ Petition and Affidavit. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in deleting the name of Petitioner in the adangal and IB as Pattadar for the agricultural land in Sy.No.202/8B to an extent of AC. 1-00 Cts in G.Palem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, for extraneous considerations, violation of principles of natural Justice and in violation of Article 14,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and also in violation of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, and consequently direct the Respondents to restore the name of the petitioner in the Adangal, IB, and in the Web land as Pattadar for the agricultural land in Sy.No.202/8B to an extent of Ac.1-00 Cts in G.Palem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District forthwith. may lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representations dated 19-07-2022 and take steps to restore the name of the petitioner in the Adangal, IB, and in the Web land as Pattadar for the agricultural land in Sy.No.202/8B to an extent of Ac. 1-00 Cts in G.Palem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 202fi Between: The Tahsildar, Renigunta Mandal, Renigunta, Tirupati District. f ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT / AND // 1. Kasara Gopi, S/o Jayaramaiah, aged about 50 Years, R/o D.No.2-124A, Marrimandha BC Colony, Papanaidu Peta Post Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Capital City, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 4. The Joint Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikalahasti Revenue Division, Srikalahasti, Tirupati District. 6. S Alfonse Devadoss (DIED) as per L.R R7, S/o Souri Nathan, C/o Tahsildar, Renigunta Mandal, Renigunta, Tirupati District 7. A Susheela, W/o Alfonse Devadoss, R/o 17-69, Old Check Post, Renigunta, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh. R7 is brought on record as L.R of the deceased respondent no.6 as per the Court's order dt.03.03.2025 in I.A.No. 01 of 2025. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS (R2 to R7 are not necessary parties in this petition) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that the Writ petition is devoid of merits full of blatant lies, hence deserves consideration therefore prayed to vacate interim order dated 20.10.2022 vide IA.No.1 of 2022 in WP.No.33680 of 2022 and also prayed to dismiss the Writ Petition No.33680 of 2022. r Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI ' / '■/ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE / Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: — The Court made the following: ORDER r APHC010549692022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 33680/2022 [3505] Between: Kasara Gopi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 The Court made the following order: The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in deleting the petitioner’s name from the revenue records, in respect of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.202/8B of G Palem Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law. The 5^^ respondent filed counter affidavit stating that 2. th pursuant to order dated 29.05.2020, passed by the 4 respondent, the 6*^ respondent’s name was mutated in revenue records as against the subject lands. It is further contended that, the petitioner contested the matter before the 4'^ respondent and after hearing the petitioner the 4^'^ respondent passed order dated 29.05.2020. After arguing the matter for some time, the counsel for the 3. petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to question order dated 29.05.2020 passed by the 4*'^ respondent. The said request of the petitioner is accepted and 4. accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn by grating 3 liberty to the petitioner passed by the 4 to question order dated respondent before appropriate forum. 29.05.2020 th There shall be no order as to costs. As applications, if any, shall stand closed. \ a sequel, pending SD/- G HELA^AIDU ASSISTANMg<^^R/^p SECTfON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To. 1. One CC to Sri Subba Rao Korrapati Advocate 2, Two CCs to GP for Revenue 3. Three CD Copies [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] TF '|5- t high court DATED;02/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.33680 of 2022 dismissing the W P COSTS AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT