Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44250 (RAJ)

SHANKAR SINGH S/O SHRI SURAJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/374/2025 · 2025-11-07

Inderjeet Singh, Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44682-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 374/2025 Shankar Singh S/o Shri Suraj Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Plot No. 62, Gopal Nagar, Police Station Muhana, Muhana, Dis- trict Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary Department Of Home, At Secretariat Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan, Com- missionerate Jaipur. 3. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan, South, Commissionerate Jaipur. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Muhana Jaipur City, South, Muhana Mandi, Jaipur. 5. Additional Director General Of Police Anti-Human Traffick- ing, Unit Jaipur, Rajasthan 6. Shyamveer Singh S/o Unkown, R/o Village Nangla Nathua, P.s. Jasrana, Distt. Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh. 7. Unknown W/o Harjesh Yadav, Village Nangla Nathua, P.s. Jasrana, Distt. Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh. 8. Harjesh Yadav S/o Unkown, R/o Village Nangla Madhua, Distt. Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav, Advocate. Mr. Ram Niwas Dhayal, Advocate. Mr. Sish Ram Yadav, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Aman Ku- mar, Advocate and Ms. Neha Goyal, Advocate. Mr. Devi Sahay, SI, P.S. Muhana. Ms. Anita, Constable. (Belt No.3406) [2025:RJ-JP:44682-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-374/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/11/2025 Today the concerned police officer has produced the corpus before us. Date of birth of the corpus is 21.08.2008 which has been confirmed by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Gov- ernment Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General. We have interacted with the corpus. She has stated before us that she wants to go and live with the petitioner (her father). Considering the statement made by the corpus and consider- ing the fact that she is below eighteen years of age, the custody of the corpus is handed over in the Court itself to the petitioner (her father) who is present in the Court. The concerned police officer is directed to make sure that no harm is caused to the corpus while going with the petitioner (her father). In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition stands disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/1-C