2025:KER:26003 BAIL APPL. NO. 3583 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 BAIL APPL. NO. 3583 OF 2025 CRIME NO.219/2025 OF Town North Police Station, Palakkad PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3: VISHNURAJ. S AGED 34 YEARS S/O SUNDHARAN, KADUCHIRA HOUSE, PATTANCHERY, PALAKKAD., PIN - 678532 BY ADVS. M.VIVEK RENEETA VINU M.R.MADHU RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT : STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 OTHER PRESENT: SR PP-HRITHWIK C S THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:26003 BAIL APPL. NO. 3583 OF 2025 2 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- B.A.No.3583 of 2025 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of March, 2025 ORDER This Bail application is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. 2. Petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.219/2025 of Palakkad Town North Police Station. The above case is registered alleging offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 110, 189, 191(2) and 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short, BNS). 3. The prosecution case is that 16-02-2025 at about 01:30 AM, the accused persons who were having enmity towards the injured for the reason that he had earlier questioned consumption of alcohol in the parking area of TT Restaurant, came in a car armed with dangerous weapons like dagger and iron rod formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and accused Nos. 1 and 2 wrongfully restrained the owner of TT restaurant and the defacto complainant, and the 1st 2025:KER:26003 BAIL APPL. NO. 3583 OF 2025 3 accused inflicted a cut injury on the leg of the injured. The 2nd accused beat the first informant on his left hand using an iron rod. When a staff of the hotel named Ameer tried to intervene accused Nos.3 to 5 fisted and kicked him. The owner of the shop had fallen down and the 1st accused using the dagger attempted to cut on his neck which he evaded and if not have evaded he could have sustained serious injuries. 4. After hearing both sides, I think this is not a fit case, in which orders u/s.482 BNSS can be passed. At this stage the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will surrender before the Investigating Officer. The counsel also submitted that there may be a direction to produce the petitioner after interrogation before the jurisdictional court and there may be a direction to the jurisdictional court to consider the bail application on the date of production of the petitioner. I think that prayer can be allowed. 5. Considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, this bail application is disposed of with the following directions. 1) The petitioner will surrender before the 2025:KER:26003 BAIL APPL. NO. 3583 OF 2025 4 Investigating Officer within two weeks from today. 2) If the petitioner surrender before the Investigating Officer as directed above, the Investigating Officer is free to interrogate the petitioner. If arrest is recorded, the petitioner shall be produced before the jurisdictional court on the date of surrender itself. 3) The petitioner is free to file bail application before the jurisdictional court at the time of producing him. If such a bail application is filed with advance copy to the prosecutor concerned, the jurisdictional court will consider that bail application in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in it preferably on the date of filing of the same itself. 4) The Investigating Officer is free to file 2025:KER:26003 BAIL APPL. NO. 3583 OF 2025 5 custody application, if necessary, at the time of producing the petitioner and if such application is filed, the jurisdictional court is free to pass appropriate orders in it also. sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE JV