PAWAN KUMAR PANDEY, S/O SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD PANDEY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16215/2025 · 2025-10-29
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43407] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16215/2025 Pawan Kumar Pandey, S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Pandey, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Dhakar Colony, Todaraisingh, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Presently Posted As Nursing Officer, Sub District Hospital Todaraisingh, District Tonk Rajasthan Employee Id Number Rjto200936003178. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur
2. Director Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan Jaipur
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Tonk. ----Respondents Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16217/2025 Bhagwan Mali S/o Gopal Lal Mali, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Takhaji Ke Samne, Ward No. 07, Todaaraisingh, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Presently Posted As Nursing Officer, Sub District Hospital Todaraisingh District Tonk, Rajasthan. Employee Id No. Rjto200936002202. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur
2. Director Medical And Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan Jaipur
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Tonk. ----Respondents And S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16222/2025 Mahendra Kumar Jain S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Jain, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Newai Tehsil Newai, District Tonk Rajasthan.
[2025:RJ-JP:43407] (2 of 4) [CW-16215/2025] Presently Posted As Nursing Officer, Sub District Hospital Newai, District Tonk Rajasthan Employee Id No. Rjt0200936003179 ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur
2. Director Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan Jaipur
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Tonk. ----Respondents And S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16229/2025 Rajesh Kumhar S/o Durgalal Kumhar, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Village Pandraheda, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk Rajasthan. Presently Posted As Nursing Officer, District Hospital Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Employee Id Rjto2000936009000936002202. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur
2. Director Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan Jaipur
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Prajapat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 29/10/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:43407] (3 of 4) [CW-16215/2025]
1. These matters raised common controversy, hence they are tagged together.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the controversy and issue raised herein is no more res integra as same has been considered and decided finally by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat at Jodhpur in case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal & Ors. : D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.532/2016 decided on 09.07.2025.
3. Having considered aforesaid, issue notice to the respondents.
4. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
5. He submits that if the controversy is finally decided and matter has attained finality in case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal & Ors. (supra), then the petitioner(s) may submit a representation to the respondents in light of said ratio and the respondents will decide the representation within four weeks and if the judgment is applicable, the benefit shall be extended.
6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner(s) are given a liberty to submit representations to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner(s) in light of ratio laid down in case of Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal & Ors. (supra). In case of deviation the representation be decided with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representations. If the judgment is applicable, then the benefits shall be extended to the petitioner(s) accordingly. After passing the order, the
[2025:RJ-JP:43407] (4 of 4) [CW-16215/2025] respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner(s) either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner(s) have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioner(s) are still aggrieved, they have a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petitions with pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/33