Ginjupalli Subba Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/14241/2016 · 2025-04-24
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44241 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44241 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14241 OF 2016 Between: Ginjupalli Subba Rao, S/o Chalapathi Rao Aged about 58 years workina as KrtsTfna^DisS^^^^*^ Branch. Krishna District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., ...Petitioner and InH of Andhra Pradesl;\^ rqp by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation Department;'Secretariat, Hyderabad. ^ fpr Co.- fopefation and Registrar of. Co-operative Societies, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad. ^
3. The Krishna District Cd^^rative Central Bank Executive Officer, Krishna District. ■ Rep., by its Chief ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 oMe Constitution of India that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ or any other
order direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing'retirement notice of is filed praying or the petitioner is and also in violation of arbitrary and same consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service in view of the Proceedings dated 10-08- 2015, 12-08-2015 and 22-08-2015 in the interest of justice contrary to Act 4 of 2014 dated;27-06-2014 Proceedings dated 10-08-20t5; H^-082015 and 22-08-2015 illegal and set aside the
7 j r ' I A. NO- 1 QF 2016(WPMP. NO: 17756 OF 2016) lettlion under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased td direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service in accordahce with Act 4 of 2014 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interesfof justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATA RAMANA SARMA, LEARMED COUNSEL APPEARED FOR SMT. M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2: GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: 3i^ The Court made the following: Order A RAJENDRA BABU ; t <■ - --O- J •v
APHC010897702016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14241/201 fi [3504] Between: Ginjupalli Subba Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.ARAJENDRA BABU 2.V KISHORE 3.GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The Court made the following Order: ...RESPONDENT(S) \ Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Venkata Ramana Sarma, learned counsel representing Smt. M.Shalini,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the
2 subsequent events, the lis in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANTLREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI M SHALINI Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI A RAJENDRA BABU, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
4. Three CD Copies gsg
HIGH COURT DATED: 25/04/2025
ORDER WP.No. 14241 of 2016 rT'!!ou?‘co™Ts'"'’ 'N'=«“CTUOUS