SHRI.CHIDANAND S/O RACHAPPA SUTAR v. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGIEER
WP/112503/2019 · 2025-04-01
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44240 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44240 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5791 WP No. 112503 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 112503 OF 2019 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI. CHIDANAND S/O RACHAPPA SUTAR, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND ADVOCATE, R/O: NAVALAGI, TQ: JAMKHANDI-587 301, DIST: BAGALKOT.
2.
SHRI. ISHWAR S/O CHIDANAND SUTAR, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND ADVOCATE, R/O: NAVALAGI, TQ: JAMKHANDI-587 301, DIST: BAGALKOT.
… PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AADITY SATYAPPANAVAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MADANMOHAN.M.KHANNUR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGIEER, K AND P HUBBALLI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. LTD., RABAKAVI-587 314, DIST: BAGALKOT.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.S.KAMATE., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5791 WP No. 112503 of 2019
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Aadity Satyappanavar., counsel on behalf of Sri.Madanmohan M.Khannur., for the petitioners and Sri.B.S.Kamate., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person.
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the notice dated 19.01.2018 issued by the respondent in No. gÀ§PÀ«/¸ÀPÁC(«)vÁ¸À/»¸À/17-18/3854-64 vide Annexure-D.
3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
4. The notice dated:19.01.2018 is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. The petitioners are at a liberty to give a suitable reply to the notice, if so advised.
5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58