■V. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATli (Special Original Jurisdiction) jl FRIDAY JHE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE honourable SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR^AO WRIT PETITION NO: 8015 OF 2013 Between: S. Nathaniel (Associate N.C;C. Officer), S/o. S. Sundara Raj, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Physical Director, D.R.G.Govt.Degree College, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist. ...Petitioner AND The Director General, N.C.C.,L West Block, R.K.Puram, New Delhi. The Deputy Director, N.C.C., Andhra Pradesh, General Chowdary Road, Secunderabad. The Group Commander, N.C.C. Group - Head Quarters; NFCL Road, Kakinada, East Godavari Dist. The 19*^ Andhra Batallion N.C.C., K.S.R.Thota, Eluru, West Godavari Dist. Rep. by its Commanding Officer. D.R.G. Govt. Degree College, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist., Rep. by its Principal.; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate direction, order or writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents disqualifying the petitioner to hold the post of A.N.O of NCC Coy in the 5*^ Respondent institution as . communicated by the 4*" respondent in Ref.No. 19(A)Bn/31l/Trg. dated 06-11-2012 as being arbitrary, illegal and subversive of Rule of Law violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India in 4 , and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as the ANO of the NCC Coy in the 5'^ respondent institution and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2013fWPMP. NO: 12304 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as A. N.O of 5 respondent Institution pending further orders. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013fWPMP. NO: 10051 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as A.N.O. of N.C.C.Copy of the 5*^ respondent institution. th Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. N J VICTOR MOSES Counsel for the Respondents: DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: APHC010412932013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8015/201 m [3330] RAO Between: Lt. S. Nathaniel (Associate N.C.C.Officer) AND The Director General, N.C.C., West Block New Delhi and others ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.N J VICTOR MOSES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.8015 of 2013 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. N J VICTOR MOSES Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies ksr HIGH COURT \ DATED;25/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.8015 of 2013 o> 2 1 JU! 2025 ‘5. ?* . Current Secuon ^ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS FOR NON-PROSECUTION