Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44238 (CHH)

BANJARI DAI MACHUWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARIYADIT, KUMHARI TANK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/847/2024 · 2025-02-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6421-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 847 of 2024 Banjari Dai Machuwa Sahakari Samiti Mariyadit, Kumhari Tank Through Its President Tikeshwar Nishad, S/o Shri Shivcharan Nishad, Aged About 29 Years, President Banjari Dai Machuwa Sahakari Samiti Mariyadit, Kumhari Tank Registration No. 2153, Tehsil Kharora, Post- Kathiya No. 1, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Appellant versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Agriculture And Fisheries Department Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Gauri Matsya Sahakari Samiti Mydt, Manpur Through Its President Smt. Anju Sonwani, W/o Debprakash Sonwani, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Manpur, House No. 232, Guru Ghasidas Chowk, P.O. Tulsi, P.S. Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Director Fisheries Department Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Senior Agriculture Development Officer Tilda- Newara, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Tilda-Newara, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - The President Krushi Sthai Samiti, Janpad Panchayat Tilda, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.02.05 16:55:41 +0530 2 For Appellant : Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 05.02.2025 1. Mr. Anup Majumdar, learned counsel for the appellant submits that instant writ appeal has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the present writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent-State, is present. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu