Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44235 (RAJ)

JAIVEER ALIAS VEER ALIAS BEER ALIAS BHANDARI S/O SHRI GIRRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1258/2025 · 2025-10-17

Avneesh Jhingan, Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42637-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1258/2025 Jaiveer Alias Veer Alias Beer Alias Bhandari S/o Shri Girraj Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ramgarh, Police Station Nivohara, District Agra (U.P.) (At Present Serving Sentence In Open Jail Kota) Through His Father - Girraj Singh S/o Shri Ram Bharosi, Aged About 58 Years R/o Ramgarh, Police Station Nivohara, Tehsil Fatiyabad, District Agra (U.p.) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Inspector General, Prison, Jaipur. 2. The District Parole Advisory Committee through the District Magistrate, Kota (Raj.). 3. The Superintendent, Central Jail Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/10/2025 AVNEESH JHINGAN,J: 1. This petition is filed challenging the order dated 06.08.2025 passed by the District Parole Advisory Committee (for short ‘committee’) rejecting the prayer for second parole of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was convicted vide judgment dated 14.09.2018 under Sections 394 & 302 IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The petitioner is presently in Open Jail, Kota. The petitioner availed parole of twenty days and surrendered on [2025:RJ-JP:42637-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1258/2025] time. The second application for parole was rejected vide impugned order. Hence, the present petition. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings. 4. The petitioner has undergone incarceration of thirteen years, five months and twenty two days including remission. The conduct of the petitioner in the Open Jail is satisfactory and he duly complied with the conditions of the first parole. The impugned order passed rejecting the prayer for second parole is without any basis. The report relied upon has no prima facie foundation. 5. In view of the previous conduct of the petitioner, the impugned order dated 06.08.2025 qua the petitioner is set aside and the criminal writ petition (Parole) is allowed. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the petitioner on second regular parole for a period of thirty days on furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Kota with the stipulation that the accused-petitioner shall surrender himself before the Jail Authorities on expiry of the parole period and shall maintain peace and tranquility during the parole period. 6. In case of failure to surrender by stipulated date, the Jail Authorities shall proceed in accordance with law. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the Superintendent, Central Jail, Kota by fax today itself for necessary compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /33