[2025:RJ-JP:48872] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2890/2025 1. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Babulal Saini, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Dhani Mauwali, Ward No. 3, Police Station - Shrimadhopur, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Ramniwas @ Niwas S/o Choturam, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Dhani Godawali, Tan Gram Bassi, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Surjaram S/o Surajmal Saini, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Dhani Balluwali, Tan Gram Bassi, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 4. Nathuram S/o Mansharam, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Dhani Gopinathjiki, Ward No. 1, Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Mohanlal S/o Late Manaram Jat, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Dhani Godawali, Tan Gram Bassi, Police Station - Jajod, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Nachiketa Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP Ms.Arti Sharma, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/12/2025 1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been preferred with the prayer for quashing the proceedings arising out of the impugned F.I.R. No.321/2017 registered at the Police Station [2025:RJ-JP:48872] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2890/2025] Shrimadhopur, District Sikar under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the trial, the parties have settled their dispute by way of entering into copromise. Now, the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the proceedings of the impugned F.I.R. be quashed. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, once the charge- sheet has been submitted in the instant matter and the trial is pending before the trial Court, it is expected from the parties to approach the Court concerned by way of filing an appropriate application. 4. The instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the parties to file an appropriate application before the trial Court and it is expected from the trial Court to decide the said application expeditiously as early as possible by passing a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /13