Krishna Nand Prajapati v. The State Of Jharkhand And Ors
WPC/3218/2017 · 2025-08-12
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4423 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4423 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:24817 1
&&IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3218 of 2017
--- Krishna Nand Prajapati Son of Jagdayal Prajapati Resident of Village Chiyanki Tola Mahadeomada P.O. Chiyanki P.S.Sadar Town Daltonganj, District Palamau( Jharkhand), At Present Resident of Village Baralota Tola Kacharwa P.Ο.- G.L.A. College Campus, P.S.-Daltonganj, District Palamau (Jharkhand)
.........Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, P.O. P.S. – Daltonganj, Distt-Palamau (Jharkhand)
3. The Block Development Officer Panki, P.O. P.S. –Panki, Distt-Palamau (Jharkhand)
........Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Faruque Ansari, Advocate For the Respondents: A.C to AAG-I
-- 11/12.08.2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
The instant writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner praying therein to quash the order dated 29.07.2009 passed by Respondent no. 2 Deputy Commissioner, Palamau at Daltonganj, whereby a direction was made to deposit Rs. 2,25,678/- within 90 days before the Block Nazarat Panki, District-Palamau, for which Certificate Case no. 01/10-11 has also been filed.
3.
After some argument, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner had preferred a representation before the Commissioner for re-
consideration of the order of punishment in view of the fact that the measurement book has not been seen by the Inquiry Officer and/or the Disciplinary Authority; as such, he prays that the instant writ application may be disposed
2025:JHHC:24817 2
of by giving direction to the Commissioner to dispose of the representation.
4.
Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that the Commissioner is not a party respondent; however, if the petitioner, so chooses, may approach the Commissioner.
5.
Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made hereinabove, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of on the submission of petitioner by giving him liberty to seek alternative remedy, if so advised.
6.
Accordingly, the instant writ application stands
disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
jk