CHANNABASAVA S/O HUSSAINPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/101377/2025 · 2025-04-07
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44226 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44226 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6095 CRL.P No. 101377 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101377 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
CHANNABASAVA S/O. HUSSAINPPA, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC. LABORER, R/O. GOREBAL VILLAGE, TQ. SINDHANUR AND DIST. RAICHUR-584101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI B.C. JNANAYYA SWAMI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH-580001.
(THROUGH GANGAVATHI TOWN P.S.)
2.
SMT. SHARNAMMA AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC. CDPO, R/O. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICE, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SINDHANOOR, DIST. RAICHUR-584101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN SPL. S.C.
(POCSO) NO.04/2025 PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE KOPPAL (SITTING AT GANGAVATHI) IN CONNECTION WITH CR.NO.141/2024, REGISTERED BY GANGAVATHI TOWN POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 363, 344, 376(2)(r), 506 OF IPC AND 5(J) (II), 6 OF POCSO 2012, AND SECTION 9 OF THE PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE (AMENDMENT) 2016 FOR PENDING TRAIL.
MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Date: 2025.04.08 11:09:30 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6095 CRL.P No. 101377 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. Memo reads as under:
“The petitioner in the above case has going to withdraw the petition on the ground that the evidence of the victim has been recorded hence, they will file fresh bail application before trial Court hence the above petition may kindly be dismiss as withdrawn.”
Memo is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
HMB CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18