4 ’f IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT! (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL fT TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT 10’ ^9. €f u. m o CO 1 € Ti- THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAK £pho^ AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITIONNO: 2779 OF 2009 Between: Krishna District Cooperative Central Bank Limited., Machilipatnam, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Bandaru Balakrishan Rao, S/o. B. Madhav Rao, aged 68 years, R/o; Gandhinagar, Machilipatnam. 2. Lok Adalat,, District Court Compound, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in P.L.C.No.392 of 2008 on the file of the 2nd respondent and set aside the order dated 12.11.2008. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2009fWPMP. NO: 3570 OF 20091 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated 12.11.2008 P.L.C.No.392 of 2008 of the 2nd respondent. in Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B ADINARAYANA RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/S. M BHASKARA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: — The Court made the following: ORDER 4 ff IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI APHC010643022009 Bench Sr.No:-1 [3483] WRIT PETITION NO: 2779 of 2009 Krishna District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Machilipatnam, represented by its Chief Executive Officer. ...Petitioner Vs. Bandaru Balakrishna Rao and another ...Respondents itifk-k-kieifk-kit Advocate for petitioner Advocate for respondents None None . CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRUUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 28th April 2025 PC : None for the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasion, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. REGISTRAR p //TRUE COPY// assistant registrar SECT^J OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri B Adinarayana Rao Advocate 2. One CC to M/s. M Bhaskara Lakshmi Advocate 3. Three CD Copies [OPUC] [OPUC] TF ► HIGH COURT DATED:28/04/2025 i '?*UG2n?5 ORDER to WP.No.2779 of 2009 Current Section . ^ DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS