APHC010957742017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) B FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42974 OF 2017 Between: Padala Ramakrishna Rao, S/o. Late Appala Naidu Aged about Sirlapothanna Street Palakonda, Srikakularn District. 58 years, R/o. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The Chief Executive Officer, District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd Srikakularn, Srikakularn District 3. The President District Cooperative Central Srikakularn District. 4. The Registrar District Cooperative Central Srikakularn District. Bank Ltd, Srikakularn, Bank Ltd, Srikakularn, ...Respondents praying that in the the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring dt.29.11.2017 in Rc.No.F5/2017-18/Estt/A1 issued by the 2nd Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith one the notice of retirement respondent % without following Act 4 of 2014 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh as arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and to set aside the same lA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 53288 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the notice of retirement dt.29.11.2017 in Rc.No.F5/2017-18/Estt/A1 issued by the 2nd Respondents and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 by continuing the Petitioner in service till the age of 60 years, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR AGRICULTURE ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI K ANOOP KUMAR, Standing Counsel The Court made the following order: APHC010957742017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42974 OF 2017 Between: 1. Padala Ramakrishna Rao S/o.Late Appala Naidu Aged about 58 years, R/o.Sirlapothanna Street Palakonda, Srikakularn District. 11 ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The Chief Executive Officer, District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. Srikakularn, Srikakularn District 3. The President District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Srikakularn, Srikakularn District. 4. The Registrar District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd, Srikakularn Srikakularn District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the notice of retirement dt.29.11.2017 in Rc.No.F5/2017-18/Estt/A1 issued by the 2nd respondent without following Act 4 of 2014 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh as arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and to set aside the same and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: A PADMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.42974 of 2017 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following main relief: “\ssue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the notice of retirement dated 29.11.2017 in Rc.No.F5/2017- 18/Estt/A1 issued by the 2’"’^ respondent without following Act 4 of 2014 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh as arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and to set aside the same and to pass ” / On 18.12.2017, this Court granted the following interim direction; 2. “It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this Court in W.P.M.P.No.43626 of 2017 in W.P No 35109 of 2017 passed an order on 27.10.2017 granting interim suspension based on an earlier order of this Court. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. In view of the same, there shall be interim suspension as prayed for. ” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of said interim direction, petitioner continued his service up to the age of 60 years and in view of subsequent events taken place, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and prays for closure of the writ 3. petition. 4 4. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is closed, since the relief has become infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- J SAROJA assistant registrar SECTION OI^FICER //TRUE COPY// I To, 1. One CC to SMT. A PADMA Advocate [OPUC] /■' 2. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI K ANOOP KUMAR, Standing Counsel [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies y gsg V HIGH COURT DATED: 04/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 42974 OF 2017 CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS