APHC010203002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Ankam Narayana Rao and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10550/2025 Ankam Narayana Rao and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3329] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 HE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10550/2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: “…..pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring action of the Respondents in taking steps trying to form road through petitioners lands covered by Sy. Nos. 181/1(Ac. 1-26 cents), 186-1D(Ac.0-63 cents), & 186-2 (Ac.0-36 cents) of Mudunuru village, Pentapadu Mandal, West Godavari District without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 300-A of Constitution of India and pass…..” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the 1st petitioner is the owner of the land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.26 cents in Sy.No.181/1 of Mudunuru Village, West Godavari District and the 2nd petitioner is the owner of the land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.99 cents in Sy.No.186-1D (Ac.0.63 cents), of Mudunuru Village, Pentapadu Mandal, West Godavari District. The names of the petitioners were mutated in the revenue records and issued pattadar passbooks and title deeds. Since then, the petitioners have been in possession of the subject properties. 3 4. While being so, the respondent Nos.3 & 4 visited the lands of the petitioners and informed the petitioners that they are going to form a road adjoining the petitioners’ lands. He further submits that the action of the respondent Nos.3 & 4 in not issuing prior notice is illegal. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed the present Writ Petition. 5. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that, the respondents will follow the due procedure of law as contemplated, if they intend to interfere with the possession of the petitioners’ subject property. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present Writ Petition, directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of the petitioners as stated herein without following the due procedure as contemplated. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 28.04.2025 SSCCHH 4 150 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.10550 of 2025 28.04.2025 SSCCHH