UMESH KUMAR v. THE COURT ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AND 6 OTHERS
A227/2068/2017 · 2025-05-05
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44195 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72828 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2068 of 2017 Petitioner :- Umesh Kumar Respondent :- The Court Addl. District Judge And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Mohan Counsel for Respondent :- Ghazala Bano Quadri,Hridaya Narain Shukla,Mohammad Hisham Qadeer,Mohd.Aslam Azhar Khan Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. It is an admitted case between the plaintiff and defendant that case for partition is pending under Section 176 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act in respect of Plot No. 224.
2. As the partition suit is pending consideration between the co- sharers, both the courts below had rightly refused to grant interim injunction in the suit instituted by plaintiff-petitioner.
3. No case for interference is made out.
4. The writ petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad