Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44193 (RAJ)

DASHRATH SINGH S/O LATE SHRI YUVRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15204/2025 · 2025-11-21

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47095] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15204/2025 Dashrath Singh S/o Late Shri Yuvraj Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Makan Number 635 Pawanpuri West Benar Road Jhotwara Police Station Kardhani Jaipur At Present Workplace At Pink Quaremall 4Th Floor Police Station Adarsh Nagar Jaipur East At Present At E-02 Gautam Marg Vaishali Nagar Jaipur (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For State For Complainant : : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Pradeep Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 51/2024 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 416, 425, 463, 464, 467, 468, 471, 323, 341 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is the sole bread earner of the family, aged about 34 years. It is further submitted that the matter at hand is triable by the Magistrate and applicant is in custody ever since 06.11.2025. It is also submitted that the matter at hand is primarily of civil nature and eviction proceedings are going on. Learned counsel has further submitted that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. [2025:RJ-JP:47095] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15204/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail application and have submitted that there are three criminal antecedents of varied nature are registered against the applicant. It is further submitted that rent agreement was executed with some other person and the present applicant is a tress-passer and has forged certain documents. It is also submitted that accused- applicant is a third-party and an act of criminal nature has been committed by the applicant. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that applicant is the sole bread earner of family, aged about 34 years; that the matter at hand is triable by the Magistrate; that the applicant is in custody ever since 06.11.2025; that matter at hand is primarily of civil nature and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the instant bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Dashrath Singh S/o Late Shri Yuvraj Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /187