KARMVEER S/O DAYANAND SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18247/2023 · 2025-10-27
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44192 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44192 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43058] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18247/2023 Karmveer S/o Dayanand Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Togra Kalan, Via Doomra, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan - 333707. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj And Rural Development, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Director, Directorate Of Elementary Education, Bikaner, (Raj.).
3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Sitabari, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narain Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 27/10/2025
1. Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC puts in appearance on behalf of respondent no.2.
2. Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC puts in appearance on behalf of respondent no.1.
3. Application no. 1/2025 stands disposed of as counsel for respondent accepts notice on behalf of respondents.
[2025:RJ-JP:43058] (2 of 2) [CW-18247/2023]
4. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC and Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC as counsel for respondents.
5. Considered application no.2/2025.
6.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the controversy and issue raised herein is already settled by judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 31/2024 Deepika Kunwar Chundawat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters, hence, present petition be disposed of in accordance with
judgment passed by the Division Bench.
7.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that if the ratio is applicable then they will consider application of ratio upon the case of present petitioner.
8. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition is
disposed of on same terms, if applicable on facts of the case, in light of judgment in case of Deepika Kunwar Chundawat (supra) passed by Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
9. The writ petition and pending application(s), if any stands
disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /55