IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 1088 Jatinder Pal Anand State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition place the petitioners above the private respondents. 2. While admitting the petition on 20.03.2012 heard along with CWP 02.12.1997. 3. Learned State counsel refers to of the affidavit filed by therein that the petitioners which petitioner No.1 did not appear while petitioner No.2 did not qualify. 4. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner by demonstrating that the 14.05.2025 ashok W Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17347 Date of decision: Anand and another Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioners. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition place the petitioners above the private respondents. While admitting the petition on 20.03.2012 heard along with CWP-11171-1997 which as a matter of fact was dismissed on Learned State counsel refers to para 2 of the affidavit filed by the Director, Hospitality Department, therein that the petitioners were informed about which petitioner No.1 did not appear while petitioner No.2 did not qualify. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner by demonstrating that the lis still survives. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17347-2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.05.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents place the petitioners above the private respondents. While admitting the petition on 20.03.2012, it was ordered to be 1997 which as a matter of fact was dismissed on para 2 of the preliminary objection , Hospitality Department, Punjab, stating informed about holding of type test in Punjabi which petitioner No.1 did not appear while petitioner No.2 did not qualify. Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No for directing the respondents to it was ordered to be 1997 which as a matter of fact was dismissed on preliminary objection tating of type test in Punjabi in with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.14 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document